中文字幕在线一区二区在线,久久久精品免费观看国产,无码日日模日日碰夜夜爽,天堂av在线最新版在线,日韩美精品无码一本二本三本,麻豆精品三级国产国语,精品无码AⅤ片,国产区在线观看视频

      ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案

      時間:2024-10-09 02:02:17 ACCA 我要投稿
      • 相關推薦

      2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

        Question:

      2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

        Apt Ltd is a small independent book company, which specialises in publishing modern poetry. In January 2013 itsigned a contract with a new poet, called Bel, to publish her second book of poems in August 2014. In March 2013, Bel won a prestigious award for her first book of poems, which had been published privately.

        In the light of the fame which now attached to Bel, Apt Ltd launched an extensive advertising campaign publicising the forthcoming book. The campaign was expensive, costing £50,000, but it was successful in generating great interest. As a result, Apt Ltd won a contract to supply a large book club with 100,000 copies of the book, which would make them a profit of £250,000.

        Unfortunately in May 2014, Bel informed Apt Ltd that she would not be able to supply the manuscript to it as she had signed a more rewarding contract with Cax plc, a very large publishing company.

        Required:

        In the context of Bel’s anticipatory breach of contract, explain any possible remedies open to Apt Ltd.

        Answer:

        The essential issues to be disentangled from the problem scenario relate to breach of contract and the remedies available for such breach.

        There is clearly a binding contractual agreement between Art Ltd and Bel, which Bel has stated she intends to break. Normally breach of a contract occurs where one of the parties to the agreement fails to comply, either completely or satisfactorily, with their obligations under it. However, such a definition does not appear to apply in this case as the time has not yet come when Bel has to produce the manuscript. She has merely indicated that she has no intention of doing so. This is an example of the operation of the doctrine of anticipatory breach. This arises precisely where one party, prior to the actual due date of performance, demonstrates an intention not to perform their contractual obligations. The intention not to fulfil the contract can be either express or implied.

        Express anticipatory breach occurs where a party actually states that they will not perform their contractual obligations (Hochster v De La Tour (1853)). Implied anticipatory breach occurs where a party carries out some act which makes performance impossible (Omnium Enterprises v Sutherland (1919)).

        When anticipatory breach takes place, the innocent party can sue for damages immediately on receipt of the notification of the other party’s intention to repudiate the contract, without waiting for the actual contractual date of performance as in Hochster v De La Tour. Alternatively, they can wait until the actual time for performance before taking action. In the latter instance, they are entitled to make preparations for performance, and claim the agreed contract price (White and Carter (Councils) v McGregor (1961)).

        It would appear that Bel’s action is clearly an instance of express anticipatory breach and that Art Ltd has the right either to accept the repudiation immediately, or affirm the contract and take action against Bel at the time for performance (Vitol SA v Norelf Ltd (1996)). In any event, Bel is bound to complete her contractual promise or suffer the consequences of her breach of contract.

        Remedies for breach of contract

        (i) Specific performance

        It will sometimes suit a party to break their contractual obligations, even if they have to pay damages. In such circumstances, the court can make an order for specific performance to require the party in breach to complete their part of the contract. However, as specific performance is not available in respect of contracts of employment or personal service, Bel cannot be legally required to provide the manuscript to Apt Ltd (Ryan v Mutual Tontine Westminster Chambers Association (1893)). This means that the only remedy against Bel lies in the award of damages.

        (ii) Damages

        A breach of contract will result in the innocent party being able to sue for damages. Apt Ltd, therefore, can sue Bel for damages, but the important issue relates to the extent of such damages.

      【ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案】相關文章:

      ACCA《公司法與商法》真題及答案09-22

      2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》訓練試題03-19

      2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》練習試題03-19

      《論語》試題及答案04-19

      為什么要考ACCA?答案就這么簡單......03-20

      acca待遇如何?acca收入多少?03-20

      Indesign認證試題及答案03-17

      excel操作試題及答案03-19

      photoshop試題附答案07-15

      主站蜘蛛池模板: 人妻少妇精品一区二区三区| 久久一级国产黄色精品| 青岛市| 渭南市| 高清一级淫片a级中文字幕| 国产一级人片内射视频播放| 亚洲熟妇夜夜一区二区三区| 精品少妇人妻久久免费| 浙江省| 亚洲午夜av福利久久久一区| 国产传媒在线视频| 日本高清一区二区三区视频| 亚洲又黄又大又爽毛片| 亚洲青青草视频免费观看| 忻州市| 扎鲁特旗| 亚洲综合久久久中文字幕| 咸丰县| 上栗县| 国产在线观看网址不卡一区| 固阳县| 一区二区三区熟女人妻| 一区二区三区婷婷在线| 亚洲av永久无码精品水牛影视| 午夜爽毛片| 日本一区二区三区啪啪| 少妇熟女淫荡丰满| 亚洲av色香蕉一区二区蜜桃| av天堂资源在线免费播放| 日本不卡一区二区高清中文| 日本高清色惰www在线视频| 亚洲一区二区三区无吗| 国产精品乱子伦一区二区三区 | 中文无码日韩欧免费视频| 久久久婷婷综合五月天| 精品丝袜一区二区三区性色| 亚洲蜜桃av一区二区三区| 亚洲色www无码| 万年县| 久久久久久久久国内精品影视| 亚洲国产精品综合福利专区|