GMAT作文錯(cuò)誤案例

時(shí)間：2024-10-10 22:35:27 出國考試我要投稿

相關(guān)推薦

GMAT作文錯(cuò)誤案例匯總

　　GMAT作文在寫作過程中會碰到哪些錯(cuò)誤呢?下面小編就對GMAT作文容易發(fā)生的幾種錯(cuò)誤進(jìn)行歸納總結(jié)，以供正在備考GMAT作文的同學(xué)進(jìn)行參考，歡迎您的查看!

GMAT作文錯(cuò)誤案例匯總

　　錯(cuò)誤一：無因果聯(lián)系

　　The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.

　　錯(cuò)誤二：樣本不足 Insufficient-sample

　　The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion (The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends), unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.

　　錯(cuò)誤三: 錯(cuò)誤類比 (based on a false analogy )<橫向>

　　The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....

　　錯(cuò)誤四：時(shí)地全等 all things are equal<縱向>

　　The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....

　　錯(cuò)誤五：二者擇一 Either-Or choice

　　The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.

　　錯(cuò)誤六：可疑調(diào)查 survey is doubtful

　　The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. (Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that...would be highly suspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretations,) Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.

　　錯(cuò)誤七：結(jié)論無據(jù) gratuitous assumption

　　The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility

　　延伸閱讀：GMAT寫作評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)大全

　　一、六分(outstanding)：對事件的復(fù)雜性的分析清楚有力;熟練駕馭有效寫作的要素。

　　1.在就某事件展開分析和闡述自己觀點(diǎn)時(shí)擺出有洞察力的原因和/或有說服力的事例。

　　2.結(jié)構(gòu)清晰。

　　3.對于語言(包括用詞和句法多樣性)有很好的掌握。

　　4.文章完全符合標(biāo)準(zhǔn)書面英語規(guī)范(包括語法、用法和拼寫規(guī)則)，但可能會有小錯(cuò)誤。

　　二、五分(strong)：對事件的復(fù)雜性有充分的分析;很好地掌握了有效寫作的要素。

　　1.闡述觀點(diǎn)時(shí)能運(yùn)用恰當(dāng)有力的理由/或事例。

　　2.結(jié)構(gòu)較清晰。

　　3.對于語言(包括用詞和句法多樣性)有良好的掌握。

　　4.較好的掌握標(biāo)準(zhǔn)書面英語規(guī)范(包括語法、用法和拼寫規(guī)則)，但可能會有小錯(cuò)誤。

　　三、四分(adequate)：對事件的復(fù)雜性有一定的分析;對寫作的要素有一定的掌握。